Michigan Chapter North American Lake Management Society
The purpose of McNALMS is to promote understanding and comprehensive management of Michigan's inland lake ecosystems
Lake Appreciation Month Celebrated
Michigan's Governor, Gretchen Whitmer proclaimed the month of July as Lake Appreciation Month. Although the month has past, our lakes in Michigan are a valued resource and should be celebrated year round. With over 11,000 lakes of 5 acres or more, our lakes provide numerous recreational, environmental and economic opportunities. The Proclamation read as follows:
McNALMS's national chapter, the North American Lake Management Society has put together a list of activities that one can take part in -- not only this month, but anytime. These include: Organize a shoreline cleanup Develop an educational self-guided lake tour Organize a hike or biking event with a focus on your local lake Reach out to a local restaurant about hosting a “Lakes Appreciation Night” with a percentage of the proceeds donated to your local lake association Enjoy your local lake, pond, or reservoir with fun summertime activities, such as: boating, kayaking, canoeing, sailing, or rowing; swimming; SCUBA diving; fishing; or enjoying the natural scenery with friends and family Help monitor your local waterbody or watershed If you manage a lake, host an activity. Bring enough sampling gear, id keys and other materials for everyone to join in. If you don’t manage a lake, ask your local lake agency about shadowing a lake manager for a day Start a watershed storm drain stenciling program Have your septic system pumped if you live close to a waterbody Go birding or take pictures at a lake or pond (don’t forget your mask!) Tap into your artistic side and draw or paint a lake scene for your home or office. Be sure to send us a copy! Organize a lake field trip for students
These and other activities will help promote lakes and their importance to the State.
Request for proposals: 2025 Lake Conservation Grant
The Midwest Glacial Lakes Partnership (MGLP) is seeking project proposals for funding from their 2025 Lake Conservation Grant program. The MGLP is one of twenty partnerships that span the nation under the umbrella of the National Fish Habitat Partnership (NFHP). The MGLP area of focus is glacial lakes and their watersheds (see figure). Nine Midwestern states, numerous federal agencies, tribal governments, and private natural resource entities have been integral partners in the development and operation of the MGLP.
Projects should benefit glacial lake fish habitats, which include the chemical, physical, and biological components of the habitats that fishes found in glacial lakes use throughout their lives. Funding is directed toward a wide range of aquatic conservation projects that benefit imperiled, endangered, and recreational fish species and their habitats. Typically 3-5 projects are funded annually between $30,000 and $100,000, but larger projects will be considered for funding up to a maximum of the approximately $300,000 expected for distribution.
Learn more and download application materials at the Lake Conservation Grant page of the MGLP website. You can submit your application by emailing it to MGLP Coordinator Joe Nohner at nohnerj@michigan.gov. If you have any questions, please contact Nohner at nohnerj@michigan.gov or 517-599-6825.
Copies of Presentations and Video from the Lunch and Learn: Current Perspectives on Wake Boats event are available under the Lunch and Learn tab above
Wake Boat Operations, Impacts Reviewed
A review of wake boats and their operations and impacts has been written by William Scott Brown, board member of McNALMS. If you are interested in the full text copy, click on the link at the end of this excerpt.
The substantive findings of several peer reviewed scientific investigations that have been conducted in recent years clearly demonstrate that the upsurge in the number of wake enhanced boats operating on the inland lakes of the Laurentian Great Lakes region are likely responsible for rendering an array of adverse impacts on frequently exposed aquatic ecosystems. A dramatic upsurge in sales of recreational vessels that are designed and operated for the sole purpose of enabling enhanced wake dependent water sports by generating wakes that possess kinetic energy levels that greatly exceed those that occur naturally has helped gain the attention of state and local government officials, law enforcement agencies, lake managers, lake conservation advocacy groups, and the news media. In addition to their significant potential to have a negative impact on vulnerable aquatic ecosystems, regularly occurring, well publicized incidents involving high energy wake perpetrated over turned kayaks, swamped fishing boats, hazardous swimming conditions, and damage to moored boats, piers, and docks have served to help focus public attention on the frequently disruptive watercraft. Heated discussion regarding the difficult public policy question of whether operation of the increasingly popular though controversial water craft should somehow be restricted, or even banned in some cases, has now migrated from marinas to state capitols where legislators, and lobbyists representing the special interests of a powerful group of stakeholders remain deeply divided on the issue (Orenstein, 2020).
Wake boats, also referred to as wake enhanced boats, are designed to generate the high energy wakes that are required to enable wake surfing and wakeboarding (Ruprecht et al., 2015; Goudey and Girod, 2015). Wake surfing, the significantly more popular of the wake enabled water sports due to the fact that it is safer and much easier for most people to master than wake boarding (Ray, 2020), involves riders who surf the substantial wake that results from shifting ballast water to the aft (rear) corner on the side of the boat that is to be surfed (Mercier-Blais and Prairie, 2014; Ruprecht et al., 2015). Enabled by operating speeds ranging from 8 - 13 mph (13 - 21 km/h), wake surfers are not attached to their boards, and are not supported by tow ropes (Ruprecht et al., 2015). In contrast, wakeboarding, whose rise in popularity began in the late 1990’s, usually involves more athletically inclined participants who strive to perform acrobatics while airborne during high jumps that are achieved by using the enhanced wakes produced by their supporting water craft as transient ‘launch’ ramps (Ruprecht et al., 2015; Boyd, 2016). Engaged at speeds ranging from 18 - 30 mph (29 - 48 km/h) (Ruprecht et al., 2015), wakeboarders are attached to their board, and pulled along well behind their supporting boat by a tow rope of up to 85 feet (26 meters) in length (Allen et al., 2019). From: A Review of the Adverse Impacts Attributed to the Operation of Wake Enhanced Boats on Inland Lake Ecosystems
Wake boats, also referred to as wake enhanced boats, are designed to generate the high energy wakes that are required to enable wake surfing and wakeboarding (Ruprecht et al., 2015; Goudey and Girod, 2015). Wake surfing, the significantly more popular of the wake enabled water sports due to the fact that it is safer and much easier for most people to master than wake boarding (Ray, 2020), involves riders who surf the substantial wake that results from shifting ballast water to the aft (rear) corner on the side of the boat that is to be surfed (Mercier-Blais and Prairie, 2014; Ruprecht et al., 2015). Enabled by operating speeds ranging from 8 - 13 mph (13 - 21 km/h), wake surfers are not attached to their boards, and are not supported by tow ropes (Ruprecht et al., 2015). In contrast, wakeboarding, whose rise in popularity began in the late 1990’s, usually involves more athletically inclined participants who strive to perform acrobatics while airborne during high jumps that are achieved by using the enhanced wakes produced by their supporting water craft as transient ‘launch’ ramps (Ruprecht et al., 2015; Boyd, 2016). Engaged at speeds ranging from 18 - 30 mph (29 - 48 km/h) (Ruprecht et al., 2015), wakeboarders are attached to their board, and pulled along well behind their supporting boat by a tow rope of up to 85 feet (26 meters) in length (Allen et al., 2019). From: A Review of the Adverse Impacts Attributed to the Operation of Wake Enhanced Boats on Inland Lake Ecosystems
.jpeg)
2024 MGLP Lake Conservation Webinars
If you missed any of the 2024 Lake Conservation Webinars, recordings are available on The Midwest Glacial Lakes Partnership website. These webinars addressed a diverse range of lake and fish habitat management issues from assessments of property lake health or property values nationwide to nutrient sourcing for one lake; from shoreline restoration techniques to farmer-led conservation coalitions; and from climate change to shoreline erosion.
Current and Past Student Research Projects Funded through McNALMS and MLSA
The Michigan Chapter North American Lake Management Society (McNALMS) and the Michigan Lakes and Streams Association (MLSA) are pleased to announce the two funded grant projects and the recipients for the 2024 Student Lake Grants program. They are: Using Remote Sensing to Quantify Methane Emissions from Lake Michigan’s Estuaries by Jillian Green, Grand Valley State; Advisor: Sean Woznicki; and Cyanobacterial Community Responses to Treatment Interventions and Species Composition Dynamics Along Inland Public Beaches in Muskegon County by Renee Tardani, Grand Valley State University Robert B. Annis Water Resources Institute; Advisor/Coordinator: Charlyn Partridge.
McNALMS and MLSA have been funding student projects since 2015. Past projects that have been funded include:
2023
Differences in attraction to artificial light between larval and adult life stages of mayflies by Melanie Bruno; Advisor: Dr. Scott Tiegs
Impact of climate change and restoration on phosphorus loading in impaired wetlands by Katherine Lucas, Grand Valley State University; Advisor: Dr. Alan Steinman
2022Under-ice photosynthetic primary production and dark carbon fixation in Lake Superior’s Keweenaw Waterway by Vanessa Cubillos Tellez, Michigan Technological University; Advisor: Dr. Trista Vick-MajorsUse of an Aquatic Remotely Operated Vehicle to Assess Relative Abundance of Fish and their Relations to Water Quality Variables by Elizabeth Belanger, Lake Superior State University; Advisor: Dr. Kevin Kapuscinski2021Lake Response to Elevated Levels of Phosphorus and Chloride by Ellen Foley, Grand Valley State University; Advisor: Dr. Alan SteinmanImpacts of Climate Change on Gene Expression in Stocked Walleye Populations by Scott Jackson, University of Michigan; Advisor: Dr. Karen Alofs2020Star Wars: Phenology of Nitellopsis obtusa (Starry Stonewort) in two Michigan drowned river mouth lakes, Michigan by Emily Neuman, Grand Valley State University Invasive Mystery Snail Detection and Characteristics of lnvaded Inland Lakes in Mid-Michigan by Emmet Smrcka, Central Michigan University; Advisor: Dr. David Zanatta2019Bloom or bust: Search for phytoplankton community drivers using long-term time-series observations and field measurements in a model Great Lakes estuary by Jasmine Mancuso, Grand Valley State University; Advisor: Dr. Bopaiah Biddanda 2018Shoreline Restoration and Source of Nutrient Enrichment Impacts on Macrophyte and Epiphytic Algal Communities by Paige Kleindl, Grand Valley State University, Advisor: Dr. Alan Steinman
2017
Littoral Primary Production and Effects of Invasive Macrophytes in Michigan Lakes by Ryan Van Goethem, Michigan Technological University, Advisor: Dr. Amy Marcarelli
Young of the Year Fish Mortality along a Lakeshore Development Gradient by Jacob Ziegler, Carey Institute and McGill University, Advisor: Dr. C. Solomon
2016
Assessment of Cyanobacteria to Suppress Growth and Development of Dreissenid Larvae by Anna Boegehold, Wayne State University; Advisor: Dr. Donna Kashian
Phosphorus Retention in West Michigan Two Stage Agricultural Ditches by Emily Kindevater, Grand Valley State University, Advisor: Dr. Alan Steinman
2015
Phosphorus Loss via Tile Drains in the Macatawa Watershed by Delilah Clement, Grand Valley State University, Advisor: Dr. Alan Steinman
Shoreline Habitat Change in Michigan Lakes: Understanding Property Owner Decisions and Impacts to Largemouth Bass Fisheries by Joe Nohner, Michigan State University, Advisor: Dr. William Taylor
.jpeg)
Wake Boat Recommendations Released by Michigan DNR
Fisheries Report #37 on A Literature Review of Wake Boat Effects on Aquatic Habitat has been officially released by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division. Wake boats are powerboats specially designed to increase wave height for watersports. There is concern that the waves produced by these boats can increase shoreline erosion; stir up bottom sediments and create hazards for humans and animals.The report recommends the following voluntary best operating practices in support of the continued use of wake boats while minimizing the effects on natural resources and near shore property:1. Boats operating in wake-surfing mode or wake-boarding mode, during which boat speed, wave shapers, and/or ballast are used to increase wave height, are recommended to operate at least 500 feet from docks or the shoreline, regardless of water depth.2. Boats operating in wake-surfing or wake-boarding modes are recommended to operate in water at least 15 feet deep.3. Ballast tanks should be completely drained prior to transporting the watercraft over land.The entire report, written by James Francis, Joel Nohner, John Bauman, and Brian Gunderman is available at this link.
Shoreland Stewards Program Releases Videos
Five videos have been released by the the Shoreland Stewards Program, a part of the Michigan Natural Shoreline Partnership. The videos explore the four zones of lakefront property and teach lakefront property residents how to be a "Shoreland Steward." The Shoreland Stewards program was created to recognize inland lake property owners who are maintaining their property in a way that reduces negative impacts that development can have on inland lakes to ensure healthy lakes for future generations for both people and fish and wildlife. The videos can be accessed on The Partnership's YouTube channel. Find out more information at: www.mishorelandstewards.org
Conservation Planner Tool Provides Lake Data for Great Lakes Region
The Midwest Glacial Lakes Partnership (MGLP) has released its new MGLP Conservation Planner, which provides lake data to inform communicators, managers, and researchers about lakes throughout the Great Lakes region. Specifically, the MGLP Conservation Planner provides data on likely suitability for fishes, land cover along the shoreline and in the lake’s watershed, and conservation recommendations to supplement existing information for each lake. Its recommended uses include provision of data to inform single-lake management, establishment of a framework for conservation strategies in each lake, identification of patterns in fish habitat due to climate and land use change, and as a supplement during potential prioritization of limited resources among lakes.
Great Lakes Conference 2022 and 2023 Presentations Available
The Great Lakes are one of Michigan’s greatest resources, providing recreational opportunities, a premier fisheries resource, water for agriculture, manufacturing, and other industries and multiple other uses. They are also subject to major problems such as invasive species, climate change, and harmful algal blooms. To view the recordings and presentations of the 2022 and 2023 Great Lakes conferences, visit the Great Lakes website.